The feature of dataviewtype in ATS is an advanced one.
A viewtype is just a linear type. The name viewtype is chosen as a viewtype often consists of a view and a type. A dataviewtype is similar to a datatype, but it is linear. With a dataviewtype, the programmer is allowed to explicitly free (or deallocate) in a safe manner the memory used for storing constructors associated with the dataviewtype. This is particularly important in a situation where garbage collection needs to be significantly reduced or even completely avoided.
An an example, the following dataviewtype list_vt is declared to model singly-linked lists in ATS:
// [list_vt] is declared to model singly-linked lists
dataviewtype list_vt (a:viewt@ype+, int) =
| list_vt_nil (a, 0)
| {n:nat} list_vt_cons (a, n+1) of (a, list_vt (a, n))
viewtypedef List_vt (a:viewt@ype) = [n:nat] list_vt (a, n)
Given a viewtype VT and an integer I, the viewtype
list_vt(VT, I) is for singly-linked lists of length I in
which each element is of viewtype VT. Let us define
List_vt as follows:
viewtypedef List_vt (a:viewt@ype) = [n:nat] list_vt (a, n)Then roughly speaking, the viewtype List_vt(VT) corresponds to the following struct type in C:
typedef struct sllist_struct {
VT head ;
sllist_struct *tail ;
} *sllist ;
where VT refers to some type in C.
// An implementation of the length function on singly-linked lists
fn{a:viewt@ype}
list_vt_length {n:nat} (xs0: !list_vt (a, n)): int n = let
fun loop {i,j:nat} .< i >.
(xs: !list_vt (a, i), j: int j): int (i+j) =
case+ xs of
| cons (_, !xs1) => begin
let val n = loop (!xs1, j+1) in fold@ xs; n end
end
| nil () => (fold@ xs; j)
in
loop (xs0, 0)
end // end of [list_vt_length]
(* ****** ****** *)
The function list_vt_length approximately corresponds to the
following function sllist_length implemented in C:
int sllist_length (sllist xs) {
int i = 0 ;
while (!xs) { i += 1 ; xs = xs->tail ; }
return i ;
}
// An implementation of the append function on singly-linked lists
fun{a:viewt@ype} list_vt_append {m,n:nat}
(xs0: &list_vt (a, m) >> list_vt (a, m+n), ys: list_vt (a, n)): void =
case+ : (xs0: list_vt (a, m+n)) => xs0 of
| cons (_, !xs) => (list_vt_append (!xs, ys); fold@ xs0)
| ~nil () => (xs0 := ys)
// An implementation of the reverse function on singly-linked lists
fn{a:viewt@ype} list_vt_reverse {n:nat} (xs: &list_vt (a, n)) = let
fun revapp {m,n:nat} .< m >.
(xs: list_vt (a, m), ys: list_vt (a, n)): list_vt (a, m+n) =
case+ xs of
| cons (_, !xs1) => begin
let val xs1_v = !xs1 in !xs1 := ys; fold@ xs; revapp (xs1_v, xs) end
end
| ~nil () => ys
in
xs := revapp (xs, nil ())
end // end of [list_vt_reverse]
// An implementation of quicksort on singly-linked lists
fun{a:viewt@ype}
list_vt_qsort {n:nat} .< n, 0 >.
(lte: (!a, !a) -> bool, xs: list_vt (a, n)): list_vt (a, n) =
case+ xs of
| cons (!x1, !xs1) =>
let val xs1_v = !xs1 in
list_vt_par<a> (
view@ (!x1), view@ (!xs1) | lte, xs, xs1, x1, xs1_v, nil (), nil ()
)
end
| nil () => (fold@ xs; xs)
and // [list_vt_par] for partition
list_vt_par {l0,l1:addr} {p,q,r:nat} .< p+q+r, p+1 >.
(pf0: a @ l0, pf1: List_vt a? @ l1 |
lte: (!a, !a) -> bool, node: list_vt_cons (l0, l1), node1: ptr l1,
x0: ptr l0, xs: list_vt (a, p), l: list_vt (a, q), r: list_vt (a, r))
: list_vt (a, p+q+r+1) = case+ xs of
| cons (!x1, !xs1) =>
let val xs1_v = !xs1 in
if lte (!x1, !x0) then begin
!xs1 := l; fold@ xs;
list_vt_par<a> (pf0, pf1 | lte, node, node1, x0, xs1_v, xs, r)
end else begin
!xs1 := r; fold@ xs;
list_vt_par<a> (pf0, pf1 | lte, node, node1, x0, xs1_v, l, xs)
end
end
| ~nil () =>
let var l = list_vt_qsort<a> (lte, l) and r = list_vt_qsort<a> (lte, r) in
!node1 := r; fold@ node; r := node; list_vt_append<a> (l, r); l
end
The code used for illustration is available here.